Premarital-Sex-Considered-As-Marriage-Legally

Google

DO YOU AGREE?

Couples Who Have Premarital Sex Should be Considered Married

Justice C.S. Karnan of the Madras High Court on Monday 17 June, 2013 has ruled in a judgment,

'If any unmarried couple of the right legal age “indulge in sexual gratification,” this will be considered a valid marriage and they could be termed “husband and wife,”.

Premarital Sex and Law

The court said that if a bachelor has completed 21 years of age and an unmarried woman 18 years, they have acquired the freedom of choice guaranteed by the Constitution. “Consequently, if any couple choose to consummate their sexual cravings, then that act becomes a total commitment with adherence to all consequences that may follow, except on certain exceptional considerations.”

The court said marriage formalities as per various religious customs such as the tying of a mangalsutra, the exchange of garlands and rings or the registering of a marriage were only to comply with religious customs for the satisfaction of society.

The court further said if necessary either party to a relationship could approach a Family Court for a declaration of marital status by supplying documentary proof for a sexual relationship. Once such a declaration was obtained, a woman could establish herself as the man’s wife in government records. “Legal rights applicable to normal wedded couples will also be applicable to couples who have had sexual relationships which are established."

What if the girl and boy separate after premarital sex?

The court also said if after having a sexual relationship, the couple decided to separate due to difference of opinion, the ‘husband’ could not marry without getting a decree of divorce from the ‘wife’.

Justice C.S. Karnan passed the order on Monday while modifying an April 2006 judgment of a Coimbatore family court in a maintenance case involving a couple. The lower court had ordered the man to pay monthly maintenance of Rs. 500 to the couple’s two children and Rs. 1000 as litigation expenses. The lower court observed that the woman’s wedding with the man had not been proved by documentary evidence. Hence, she was not entitled to maintenance.

In her appeal to the High Court, the woman’s counsel contended that she was legally married and had two children in wedlock.

Why Justice C. S. Karnan gave ruling of marriage in this case?

Justice Karnan said he was of the view that a valid marriage did not necessarily mean that all the customary rights pertaining to the married couple are to be followed and subsequently solemnised. In the present case, the woman and her husband had no encumbrance or other disqualification for solemnising their wedding as per their customs. For solemnising a wedding, legal aspects should be placed on a higher scale than the customary aspects.

1.

In this case, the man had signed in the ‘live birth report’ of his second child and given his consent for a Caesarean section for its birth. As such, he had officially admitted that she was his wife.

“Without legal encumbrance or third party interference or without affecting third party rights,

2.

both the petitioner and the respondent lived together as spouses and begot two children.” Therefore, the question of an illegitimate relationship did not arise. Wedding solemnisation was only a customary right, but not a mandatory one. Hence, the judge said, he was treating the couple as spouses in normal life.

“It is not disputed that the petitioner has been a spinster before she gave birth and that the respondent was a bachelor before developing sexual relationship with the petitioner. Both of them led their marital life under the same shelter and begot two children. Therefore, the petitioner’s rank has been elevated as the `wife’ of the respondent and likewise, the respondent’s rank has been elevated as the `husband’ of the petitioner. Therefore, the children born to them are legitimate children and the petitioner is the legitimate wife of the respondent.”

The judge directed the woman’s husband to pay her a monthly maintenance of Rs.500 from the date of petition, i.e. from September 2000. The arrears of maintenance up to May this year should be paid within a period of three months.

TWITTER

LINKEDIN

Google Find us on Google plus + Source Acknowledgment Copyright

By SPECIAL CORRESPONDENT in

THE HINDU, Tamil Nadu

Titled NATIONAL » TAMIL NADU CHENNAI, June 17, 2013

Couples who have premarital sex to be considered ‘married,’ says HC

Retrieved on June 19, 2013

By Ashok Koparday Find us on Google plus +

No comments:

TO GET INFO FAST

For INSTANT ANSWERS use SEARCH BOX in the left top of your web page.
To ASK SEXOLOGIST click black tab on the right --->
Click
BEYOND VIAGRA
NEW TREATMENT
ERECTILE DYSFUNCTIONS.

EMAIL OF DR. ASHOK KOPARDAY ask[at]mydoctortells[dot]com.

MY DOCTOR TELLS BEST MEDICINES PREMATURE EJACULATION

mydoctortells 100% cure masturbation addiction excess nightfall